July 21, 2019
Ahead of the first T20 Physical Disability Cricket World Series, two
key officials of the All India Cricket Association for Physically Challenged
have stepped down alleging bias in the selection process and bad management.
However, key AICPAC officials have dismissed these allegations and say that
these officials are playing personal politics which is needlessly damaging
the future of physically disabled cricket at a critical juncture.
Just two weeks to go before the first ever T20 Physical Disability
Cricket World Series starts in England, controversy hits Indian
disabled cricket.
Earlier this year, the Board of Control for Cricket in India
(BCCI) had brought three bodies – Disabled Sporting
Society, Indian Cricket Federation for Disabled
(ICFD) and Physically Challenged Cricket Association of
India (PCCAI) – under one umbrella – and authorised this body to
select a team for the first-ever world series.
Now two key officials, Haroon Rashid, Joint Secretary,
AICPAC and Dr Abdul Siddiqui, who was the
Vice President have quit their posts alleging bias in team
selection. Siddiqui, who headed the ICFD says they tried to resolve the issue
with Ashok Wadekar, brother of legendary cricketer
Ajit Wadekar who also founded the AICPAC, but were ignored.
We tried speaking to Ashok Wadekar and gave written statements as well
after which we were promised meetings but this was not honoured, forcing us
to take this step. As a result, we have withdrawn from the AICPAC. The team
which will play for India in the world event has been chosen without
following due process. The selection process was a sham with outstanding
players being left out and preference given to players from Maharashtra and
Haryana. – Dr Abdul Siddiqui, Former Vice President, All India
Cricket Association for Physically Challenged (AICPAC)
These allegations have been voiced by prominent players like Suvro
Joarder as well. Speaking to NewzHook a week ago,
Suvro had said that players with considerable international experience were
sidelined in the selection trials.
“When the trials were held in Hubli, the idea was to call cricketers that
associations had recommended”, said Suvro. Of the lot finally called, many
were non-deserving, he alleged. Apart from Suvro, other well-known cricketers
who did not make it to the list are Jeet Bhowmik and
Kailash Prasad.
“All the four associations should have played matches and chosen the good
players but instead politics was played, says Kailash, who plays for Agra,
“I am the opener for the national side, but I was not given a chance. The
trials were organised poorly with certain groups taking over”.
Allegations that Pradeep Raj, Founder of
wheelchair cricket in India, and a prominent disability rights activist, has
dismissed strongly. “These are personal and petty politics that some people
are playing ahead of a series where we want India to put its best foot
forward”. Raj says Dr Siddiqui and Rashid are disgruntled as they were not
included in the committee although the AICPAC is following BCCI norms in
doing so. “If you notice the final line up, there’s a player from every
association present and they are being given the best training and
facilities”.
For long, disabled cricket in India has been struggling for a platform and
the purpose of forming an umbrella group was to ensure that players across
India finally had a fair chance. A major controversy erupting on the eve of a
major international series should not impact the future of the game at a
critical juncture.
ALSO READ:India Divyang Cricket Team is raring to make
its mark in first ever world series
